# Coinduction¶

The corecursive definitions below are accepted if the option
`--guardedness`

is active:

```
{-# OPTIONS --guardedness #-}
```

(An alternative approach is to use Sized Types.)

## Coinductive Records¶

It is possible to define the type of infinite lists (or streams) of
elements of some type `A`

as follows:

```
record Stream (A : Set) : Set where
coinductive
field
hd : A
tl : Stream A
```

As opposed to inductive record types, we have to introduce the keyword
`coinductive`

before defining the fields that constitute the record.

It is interesting to note that it is not necessary to give an explicit
constructor to the record type `Stream`

.

Now we can use copatterns to create `Stream`

s, like one that
repeats a given element `a`

infinitely many times:

```
repeat : {A : Set} (a : A) -> Stream A
hd (repeat a) = a
tl (repeat a) = repeat a
```

We can also define pointwise equality (a bisimulation and an equivalence) of a pair of `Stream`

s as a
coinductive record:

```
record _≈_ {A} (xs : Stream A) (ys : Stream A) : Set where
coinductive
field
hd-≡ : hd xs ≡ hd ys
tl-≈ : tl xs ≈ tl ys
```

Using copatterns we can define a pair of functions
on `Stream`

s such that one returns the elements in
the even positions and the other the elements in the odd positions:

```
even : ∀ {A} → Stream A → Stream A
hd (even xs) = hd xs
tl (even xs) = even (tl (tl xs))
odd : ∀ {A} → Stream A → Stream A
odd xs = even (tl xs)
split : ∀ {A} → Stream A → Stream A × Stream A
split xs = even xs , odd xs
```

as well as a function that merges a pair of `Stream`

s by interleaving their elements:

```
merge : ∀ {A} → Stream A × Stream A → Stream A
hd (merge (xs , ys)) = hd xs
tl (merge (xs , ys)) = merge (ys , tl xs)
```

Finally, we can prove that `merge`

is a left inverse for `split`

:

```
merge-split-id : ∀ {A} (xs : Stream A) → merge (split xs) ≈ xs
hd-≡ (merge-split-id _) = refl
tl-≈ (merge-split-id xs) = merge-split-id (tl xs)
```

## Old Coinduction¶

Note

This is the old way of coinduction support in Agda. You are advised to use Coinductive Records instead.

To use coinduction it is recommended that you import the module Coinduction from the standard library. Coinductive types can then be defined by labelling coinductive occurrences using the delay operator `∞`

:

```
data Coℕ : Set where
zero : Coℕ
suc : ∞ Coℕ → Coℕ
```

The type `∞ A`

can be seen as a suspended computation of type `A`

. It comes with delay and force functions:

```
♯_ : ∀ {a} {A : Set a} → A → ∞ A
♭ : ∀ {a} {A : Set a} → ∞ A → A
```

Values of coinductive types can be constructed using corecursion, which does not need to terminate, but has to be productive. As an approximation to productivity the termination checker requires that corecursive definitions are guarded by coinductive constructors. As an example the infinite “natural number” can be defined as follows:

```
inf : Coℕ
inf = suc (♯ inf)
```

The check for guarded corecursion is integrated with the check for size-change termination, thus allowing interesting combinations of inductive and coinductive types. We can for instance define the type of stream processors, along with some functions:

```
-- Infinite streams.
data Stream (A : Set) : Set where
_∷_ : (x : A) (xs : ∞ (Stream A)) → Stream A
-- A stream processor SP A B consumes elements of A and produces
-- elements of B. It can only consume a finite number of A’s before
-- producing a B.
data SP (A B : Set) : Set where
get : (f : A → SP A B) → SP A B
put : (b : B) (sp : ∞ (SP A B)) → SP A B
-- The function eat is defined by an outer corecursion into Stream B
-- and an inner recursion on SP A B.
eat : ∀ {A B} → SP A B → Stream A → Stream B
eat (get f) (a ∷ as) = eat (f a) (♭ as)
eat (put b sp) as = b ∷ ♯ eat (♭ sp) as
-- Composition of stream processors.
_∘_ : ∀ {A B C} → SP B C → SP A B → SP A C
get f₁ ∘ put x sp₂ = f₁ x ∘ ♭ sp₂
put x sp₁ ∘ sp₂ = put x (♯ (♭ sp₁ ∘ sp₂))
sp₁ ∘ get f₂ = get (λ x → sp₁ ∘ f₂ x)
```

It is also possible to define “coinductive families”. It is recommended not to use the delay constructor (`♯_`

) in a constructor’s index expressions. The following definition of equality between coinductive “natural numbers” is discouraged:

```
data _≈’_ : Coℕ → Coℕ → Set where
zero : zero ≈’ zero
suc : ∀ {m n} → ∞ (m ≈’ n) → suc (♯ m) ≈’ suc (♯ n)
```

The recommended definition is the following one:

```
data _≈_ : Coℕ → Coℕ → Set where
zero : zero ≈ zero
suc : ∀ {m n} → ∞ (♭ m ≈ ♭ n) → suc m ≈ suc n
```