Flat Modality¶
The flat/crisp attribute @♭/@flat is an idempotent comonadic
modality modeled after Spatial Type Theory and Crisp Type Theory. It is similar to a necessity modality.
We can define ♭ A as a type for any (@♭ A : Set l) via an
inductive definition:
data ♭ {@♭ l : Level} (@♭ A : Set l) : Set l where
con : (@♭ x : A) → ♭ A
counit : {@♭ l : Level} {@♭ A : Set l} → ♭ A → A
counit (con x) = x
When trying to provide a @♭ arguments only other @♭
variables will be available, the others will be marked as @⊤ in the context.
For example the following will not typecheck:
unit : {@♭ l : Level} {@♭ A : Set l} → A → ♭ A
unit x = con x
Pattern Matching on @♭¶
Agda allows matching on @♭ arguments by default.
When matching on a @♭ argument the flat
status gets propagated to the arguments of the constructor
data _⊎_ (A B : Set) : Set where
inl : A → A ⊎ B
inr : B → A ⊎ B
flat-sum : {@♭ A B : Set} → (@♭ x : A ⊎ B) → ♭ A ⊎ ♭ B
flat-sum (inl x) = inl (con x)
flat-sum (inr x) = inr (con x)
When refining @♭ variables the equality also needs to be
provided as @♭
flat-subst : {@♭ A : Set} {P : A → Set} (@♭ x y : A) (@♭ eq : x ≡ y) → P x → P y
flat-subst x .x refl p = p
if we simply had (eq : x ≡ y) the code would be rejected.
Pattern matching on @♭ arguments can be disabled entirely by using
the --no-flat-split flag
{-# OPTIONS --no-flat-split #-}
Subtyping of flat function spaces¶
Normally, if f : (@♭ x : A) → B then we have λ x → f x : (x : A)
→ B but not f : (x : A) → B. When the option --subtyping is
enabled, Agda will make use of the subtyping rule (@♭ x : A) → B <:
(x : A) → B, so there is no need for eta-expanding the function
f.